Category Archives: Discussing ArchiMate

Posts discussing ArchiMate’s model/grammar.

ArchiMate 3.0.1

The Open Group has just released its ‘Technical Corrigendum No. 1’ (TC1) for ArchiMate 3.0 from June 2016. TC1. It is a substantial improvement over 3.0 even if it is just a minor version upgrade. Part of the change is … Continue reading

Posted in Discussing ArchiMate, Mastering ArchiMate, Using ArchiMate | Leave a comment

The ArchiMate 3.0 Relations Table…

…has serious, and many, errors. According to my personal analysis, 152 valid relations are missing, and potentially 2941 relations that are in that table shouldn’t be, if the text of the standard is to be believed or if we use some common sense. … Continue reading

Posted in Discussing ArchiMate, Tooling | 7 Comments

What is wrong with this picture?

Time for another — this time very short — educational quiz post. Look at the following diagram (in the Mastering ArchiMate colour scheme). Is this OK?

Posted in Discussing ArchiMate, Using ArchiMate | Tagged | 13 Comments

An AchiMate 3 Map (Layers? What Layers! — 1)

ArchiMate 3 is setup with 5-6 layers (Strategy, Business, Application, Technology/Physical, Implementation) and 4 aspects: (Passive and Active) Structure, Behaviour and Motivation. Quoting the standard:

Posted in Discussing ArchiMate | Tagged | 2 Comments

Follow-up to “Is ArchiMate Open?”

A (concluding) piece about the licensing issues surrounding ArchiMate has been published over on Chess and the Art of Enterprise Architecture. Published there, because it is not so much about ArchiMate modelling or the language, but about legal issues and … Continue reading

Posted in Discussing ArchiMate | Tagged | Leave a comment

ArchiMate 3.0: The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly

On June 14, the 3.0 version of the ArchiMate standard was unveiled during the Enterprise Architecture Conference Europe 2016. Time for a review. I’ve divided it up in The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly, with The Good standing for changes … Continue reading

Posted in Discussing ArchiMate | Tagged , | 16 Comments

Is ArchiMate® and Open Standard? Not really.

A short post, because it is only here to point you to the real story over on enterprisechess.com. The reason it’s been published there is that it is not so much about the language itself and how to model in … Continue reading

Posted in Discussing ArchiMate | Tagged | Leave a comment